The Senate has voted in favor of remote activation of cameras and microphones on phones for specific investigations. This controversial measure, outlined in Article 3 of the bill proposed by the Minister of Justice, has been strongly criticized by the left-wing and various associations.
The justice bill was discussed in the Senate on Wednesday, June 7th, and the topic of remote activation of cameras and microphones on phones was passionately debated. The purpose of this measure is to enable investigators to monitor the conversations and exchanges of individuals suspected of committing crimes. Sometimes, authorities have reason to believe that certain individuals use their mobile phones to exchange coded messages or organize criminal activities. In such cases, direct access to their devices is deemed necessary to prevent crimes from occurring.
However, this measure is controversial because it would allow authorities to remotely activate the cameras and microphones on phones without the owners’ consent. People could unknowingly be filmed or recorded, including in private places like their homes. This invasion of privacy is considered by many to be a violation of individual liberties.
Voices are rising against this measure. The left-wing is concerned about this article becoming an open door to excessive practices by the state, such as the surveillance of private places or the monitoring of conversations within political or union organizations. Associations have also pointed out the violation of the privacy rights of the individuals involved. Indeed, this measure would allow investigators to monitor individuals without any prior judicial oversight.
Nevertheless, the Senate ultimately voted in favor of this measure. Supporters of this provision have emphasized that its use will not be systematic and that controls are in place to protect the rights of the individuals targeted. However, opponents have expressed concerns about the scope of this measure and its potential consequences on privacy.
In summary, the remote activation of cameras and microphones on phones is a controversial measure. The Senate has voted in favor of this provision, which some consider to be an infringement on privacy. This decision highlights the tensions surrounding the issue of surveillance and individual liberties in our society.
